news on CYBX
Today, more red was shed today with the lower closing share price. Once again, it seems the analysts and the market DID NOT get the big picture of the vision of the future Cyberonics wanted to present, or did they?
Three Boy
Boy
GMI
News
Racers
This us vs. them and business as usual was in play, and it is a two way street. Results from this company must be blow-out before even the smallest glimmer of respect is attained by Cyberonics. They have too long a history of past shortcomings, of share-owner disappointments, of failing to meet their own projections. When they do, it seems the only option is to take the profit, or a smaller loss, when the opportunity is presents.
PSX
Extreme
Sygate
Cougar
Eve
They seem to continue to be unwilling to work with the groups necessary to build a truly successful company. They insist on presenting information and numbers which must be dissected to insure you understand what they are trying to say. "Say what you mean and mean what you say." This would better serve them.
Gen
1tF
RampRage
Age
Kayako
Is it really the share-owners, analysts, and media's job to dig under every rock to understand every weird metric (e.g. quarterly annualized sales, and the subsequent AP correction) Cyberonics company decides to use? Don't most public companies attempt to be as transparent (who often uses that word) as possible? Don't they lead shareowners and analysts in explaining the road they are taking to become a successful company? Don't they explain the why's for someone placing investment dollars in shares of their business?
Fathom
NFS
Cars
URESK
Forums
It's the same old story line. It is protecting the management team. Yet, doing so every conference call does little to inspire additional investment in the company. This is especially true from existing shareowners. And, forget about inspiring new investors to the stock.
Short
Media
Country
Tab
Shareowner value creation is what we all want. We keep waiting for the WHEN, in a meaningful, and most importantly and LASTING manner.
Three Boy
Boy
GMI
News
Racers
This us vs. them and business as usual was in play, and it is a two way street. Results from this company must be blow-out before even the smallest glimmer of respect is attained by Cyberonics. They have too long a history of past shortcomings, of share-owner disappointments, of failing to meet their own projections. When they do, it seems the only option is to take the profit, or a smaller loss, when the opportunity is presents.
PSX
Extreme
Sygate
Cougar
Eve
They seem to continue to be unwilling to work with the groups necessary to build a truly successful company. They insist on presenting information and numbers which must be dissected to insure you understand what they are trying to say. "Say what you mean and mean what you say." This would better serve them.
Gen
1tF
RampRage
Age
Kayako
Is it really the share-owners, analysts, and media's job to dig under every rock to understand every weird metric (e.g. quarterly annualized sales, and the subsequent AP correction) Cyberonics company decides to use? Don't most public companies attempt to be as transparent (who often uses that word) as possible? Don't they lead shareowners and analysts in explaining the road they are taking to become a successful company? Don't they explain the why's for someone placing investment dollars in shares of their business?
Fathom
NFS
Cars
URESK
Forums
It's the same old story line. It is protecting the management team. Yet, doing so every conference call does little to inspire additional investment in the company. This is especially true from existing shareowners. And, forget about inspiring new investors to the stock.
Short
Media
Country
Tab
Shareowner value creation is what we all want. We keep waiting for the WHEN, in a meaningful, and most importantly and LASTING manner.
posted by Don Marchand | 7:18 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home